Issue 00346 

Nov 13 - 19, 2004

Society

POVERTY NOT THE REAL ISSUE FOR CHILD LABOUR

By: Boniface Mouti

The other day I was at the Tengeru market, and as usual it never escapes my eyes watching those children selling plastic paper bags called AMarlboro@ and some pulling heavy carts. I get concerned and my question has been; is it true that these children are doing all these because they are poor at home? I asked my friend who comes from around that area whether indeed these children come from poor families who cannot afford to feed them. His response was Athese are children who come from around and find going to school tedious for them and their parents have no time to follow them up@.

Research has shown that poverty is not, as is often believed, the major cause of child labour nor is it the main obstacle to making full-time formal education accessible for every child. Child labour is in the vast majority of cases not necessary to >help families survive=. Many studies show that children=s wages only contribute in a meagre way to the family=s income, whereas the cost of children missing out on education is much greater in both the individual development of the child as well as development of society as a whole. Several experiences in a country like ours show us that existing social norms, tradition, exclusion and discrimination of certain groups as well as a badly or >indifferently= functioning educational system are the most important reasons why children are working and not attending school.

The discussion about the right to education often ignores the inextricable link between universalisation of education and the abolition of child labour. A large number of children are not going to school because of their involvement in some form of child labour. The emphasis has been on providing infrastructure and improving the quality of education. Though these inputs are very important, they are not enough to bring all children to school. It is essential that the school system itself - together with other >stakeholders like parents, children and civil society - actively enrols and retains all working and other out-of-school children - including girls who work at home - into formal full-time education. This implies the need to establish or (re)confirm the norm that work should never be an impediment to full-time education.

Many people however - including international donors - believe that child labour is >a necessary evil=. This view limits the international donors= approach on child labour mainly to a focus on its worst forms labour, leading to piecemeal ad hoc solutions and creating an obstacle to a sustainable comprehensive strategy towards the elimination of all forms of child labour. The result is often that one group of children is replaced by another as a cheap source of labour, since there is no norm that child labour is unacceptable. Providing informal part-time education to working children, equally conveys the message that child labour is acceptable for some children, thereby creating or reinforcing >=first and second class rights= to education. Within this context the campaign maintains that any form of child education, like night schools or part-time education, are supporting child labour and therefore must be challenged.

To ensure the right to full-time education, international donors must B wherever possible B contribute to the promotion and implementation of laws on compulsory education and the prohibition of child labour and their compatibility. In addition, they must contribute to the right to education and prohibition of child labour in practice. It is therefore necessary that development co-operation for basic education is guided by the following criteria and considerations:

Co-operation between the ministries of education, labour and other relevant departments, especially with regard to a better co-ordination of the inspections on education and labour. Formal full-time education should become and remain free of costs for all children. That includes any additional costs like schoolbooks, uniforms and school transport, which should B especially where the poor are concerned - be borne by the government. Establishing the norm that no child should work has to be part and parcel of every programme that aims to get all children into full-time education. This can only be done through the education and mobilisation of each and every >stakeholder= in education: including children, parents, teachers, town and village councils, (local) government, education and labour inspection, institutions for welfare and security, public transport, unions and NGOs.

The mandate, competencies and funding of the education system (from the Ministry for Education to every single school) should be designed in such a way that the education system is not only responsible for children already going to school. It should also be responsible for the implementation of measures to get all working and other non-school going children into school, including any child under fourteen that has missed school when he/she was younger. It is also necessary to establish a system of visits to (likely) >drop-outs= and their parents as soon as possible, talk about their problems and try to find a solution. All this means that close cooperation is needed between all stakeholders and that resources should be made available allowing active participation of the local community.

The above mentioned mandate should also include the organisation of >bridge-schools= (via courses, classes, extra lessons etc.) that will help older children to mainstream into full-time education. In addition >bureaucratic barriers= to education should be removed or parents should be supported to overcome them. These include: filling in registration forms, securing of a birth certificate or a medical proof of illness, inadequate school transport, mandatory school uniforms, impossibility to enrol after the age of 6 etc. All these seemingly trivial issues often keep children out of school and/or lead to drop-outs. The education system should help parents - especially those who are illiterate and poor - to deal with these matters. Let us save our children from exploitative habits like child labour.

Mr. Mouti is the Director for Children for Children's Future (CCF), an NGO committed to empowering and protecting street children in Arusha.

Email: rehofo@yahoo.com

Features

Back ] Up ] Next ]

Home ] Contents ] Street Talk ] Off Topic ] Dark Side ] Meditation ] Mailbag ] Archives ] Contact Us ] Search Arusha Times ]

Last modified: November 14, 2004 .
Copyright © 2001 -  2004  Arusha Times.  E-mail:
arushatimes@habari.co.tz

Webmaster:   WDJMallya